MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4212884862 · doi:10.1080/135771402320883862

Oral Presentations

2002· article· en· W4212884862 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueSarcoma · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsOttawa Regional Cancer FoundationUniversité de MontréalLunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research InstituteMount Sinai Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineTraditional medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objectives: Surgery is the elective treatment for chest wall sarcoma. Local recurrence, varies from 7% (Pairolero) to 52% (King), and is normally determined by an inadequate surgical exeresis. The goal of this paper is to de ne a preoperative approach to study tumor margins. Methods: 19 patients with a chest wall sarcoma were routinely submitted to an Rx, CT, MRI, total body scintigraphy, and US evaluation. US was always performed by the same person with a Siemens Sonoline Omnia, employing a probe 5-13 Mhz, and performing a color-doppler evaluation of the lesion. The scan was done with the patient lying in the surgical position. Tumor lateral margins were identi ed and a line was marked out at 4 cm (safe oncological margin).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.191
Threshold uncertainty score0.273

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.8090.549

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSarcomaSame topicSarcoma Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207