MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4212892298 · doi:10.1109/jestpe.2022.3152479

Nonisolated DC–DC Power Converter Synthesis Using Low-Entropy Equations

2022· article· en· W4212892298 on OpenAlexaff
Thilina S. Ambagahawaththa, Dulika Nayanasiri, Ajith Pasqual, Yunwei Li

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Journal of Emerging and Selected Topics in Power Electronics · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced DC-DC Converters
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConvertersComputer scienceDuty cycleInterfacingElectronic engineeringTopology (electrical circuits)VoltageControl theory (sociology)Electrical engineeringEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

There is a growing demand for novel nonisolated dc–dc power converters with the deployment of dc power distribution systems integrating renewable sources and energy storing elements. The load and source of these applications have different input and output voltage levels, and it is vital to avoid operating the interfacing power converters at extreme duty ratios. Therefore, engineers and researchers explore the power converter synthesizing techniques since the mid-1970s, fulfilling the above requirement besides the nonpulsating input and output current. Among them, the analytical synthesis method has gained popularity, although it gives rise to high-entropy equations. This article shows a simple yet powerful topology synthesis method based on the low-entropy equations that reveal the connection between the energy storing elements and switches. To this end, a set of design rules have been introduced in this article to realize the voltage-second balance equations obtained by decomposing the voltage gain polynomial using design-oriented analysis. Moreover, different decomposition levels of the gain polynomial have been discussed to embed inductors at either input or output or both ports. Furthermore, the synthesis of multitopology converters using low-entropy equations has been demonstrated. The applicability of the proposed method is validated using motivational examples and using experimental results of the selected converters.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.577
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Journal of Emerging and Selected Topics in Power ElectronicsSame topicAdvanced DC-DC ConvertersFrench-language works237,207