MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4212896616 · doi:10.5382/econgeo.4895

Constraints on the Genesis of Cobalt Deposits: Part I. Theoretical Considerations

2022· article· en· W4212896616 on OpenAlexafffund
Anthony E. Williams‐Jones, O. V. Vasyukova

Bibliographic record

VenueEconomic Geology · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsCobaltSulfideUltramafic rockGeochemistryMaficOlivineCobalt sulfideGeologyChemistryMaterials scienceInorganic chemistryMetallurgyElectrochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Cobalt is in high demand because of the key role that cobalt-lithium-ion batteries are playing in addressing the issue of global warming, particularly in facilitating the transition from the internal combustion engine to electrically driven vehicles. Here, we review the properties of cobalt and the history of its discovery, briefly describe its mineralogy, and explore the processes that concentrate it to potentially exploitable levels. Economic cobalt deposits owe their origin to the compatible nature of Co2+, its concentration in the mantle in olivine, and its release, after high degrees of partial melting, to komatiitic and (to a lesser extent) basaltic magmas. Primary magmatic deposits, in which Co is subordinate to Ni, develop through the separation of immiscible sulfide liquids from mafic and ultramafic magmas and the very strong partitioning of these metals into the sulfide liquid. We evaluate the factors that concentrate cobalt to economic levels by these processes. Cobalt is also concentrated by aqueous fluids, either at ambient temperature in laterites developed over ultramafic rocks or hydrothermally in sediment-hosted copper deposits and in cobalt-rich vein deposits, where it crystallizes mainly as sulfide and arsenic-bearing minerals, respectively. Using the available thermodynamic data for aqueous Co species, we evaluate cobalt speciation as a function of temperature and show that, whereas it is transported at ambient temperature in most environments as the simple ion (Co2+), it is most mobile in hydrothermal systems as chloride species. Based on thermodynamic data compiled from a variety of sources, we evaluate stability relationships among some of the principal cobalt sulfide and oxide minerals as a function of temperature, pH, fO2, and αH2S and, in conjunction with the aqueous speciation data, determine their solubility. This information is used, in turn, to predict the physicochemical conditions most favorable for cobalt transport and ore formation by hydrothermal fluids. As thermodynamic data are not available for the cobalt arsenide and sulfarsenide minerals that form the vein-type ore deposits, we use chemographic analysis to qualitatively evaluate their stability relationships and predict the physicochemical controls of ore formation. The data and interpretations of processes presented in this paper provide the theoretical basis for a companion paper in this issue in which we develop plausible models for the genesis of the principal cobalt deposit types.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.039

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.185
Teacher spread0.171 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations77
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEconomic GeologySame topicGeological and Geochemical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207