MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4212901485 · doi:10.1109/icaml54311.2021.00033

Software and Hardware Integrated Accelerators for Hadoop Appliance

2021· article· en· W4212901485 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Yuan Meng, Jun Yang, Jun Li, Shengkai Wang, Xiao Zhang

Bibliographic record

Venue2021 3rd International Conference on Applied Machine Learning (ICAML) · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAlgorithms and Data Compression
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceThroughputScalabilityComputer hardwareField-programmable gate arrayData compressionLossless compressionSoftwareEmbedded systemHardware accelerationHardware architectureComputer architectureOperating systemWireless

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With the development of the Internet, the data center for next-generation must be capable of data processing at PB/s level, ensuring a high throughput of the storage and network. This paper displays the design of the hardware accelerator for tuning the throughput of the storage and network. First, we illustrate the importance of a lossless data compression algorithm for data-intense applications based on the analysis of the characteristics of the Hadoop distributed system. Second, we effectively implement Deflate compression algorithm on the FPGA. The experimental results show that the compression speed of the Deflate compression algorithm hardware accelerator can reach 2.44 Gb/S, and the compression ratio is 2.08 on the Calgary standard evaluation set. Finally, we propose a hardware/software integration architecture to combine Deflate compression algorithm hardware accelerator and Hadoop distributed system. This architecture also incorporated the unique design of semaphore and shared-memory mechanism. The overall design can double the performance of a single mapping process and retain good scalability.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.757
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue2021 3rd International Conference on Applied Machine Learning (ICAML)Same topicAlgorithms and Data CompressionFrench-language works237,207