A Multipurpose Wearable Sensor-Based System for Weight Training
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In recent years, there has been growing interest in automated tracking and detection of sports activities. Researchers have shown that providing activity information to individuals during their exercise routines can greatly help them in achieving their exercise goals. In particular, such information would help them to maximize workout efficiency and prevent overreaching and overtraining. This paper presents the development of a novel multipurpose wearable device for automatic weight detection, activity type recognition, and count repetition in sports activities such as weight training. The device monitors weights and activities by using an inertial measurement unit (IMU), an accelerometer, and three force sensors mounted in a glove, and classifies them by utilizing developed machine learning models. For weight detection purposes, different classifiers including Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA), Support Vector Machine (SVM), and Multi-layer Perceptron Neural Networks (MLP) were investigated. For activity recognition, the K nearest neighbor (KNN), Decision Tree (DT), Random Forest (RF), and SVM models were trained and examined. Experimental results indicate that the SVM classifier can achieve the highest accuracy for weight detection whereas RF can outperform other classifiers for activity recognition. The results indicate feasibility of developing a wearable device that can provide in-situ accurate information regarding the lifted weight and activity type with minimum physical intervention.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it