La résilience des psychologues cliniciens
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’attention portée aux problèmes rencontrés par les psychologues cliniciens dans leur activité professionnelle a engendré, depuis quelques années, une approche basée sur la résilience. Aucune publication disponible n’apporte, toutefois, des informations issues de l’évaluation de la résilience chez ces psychologues et le présent article présente les premières données sur ce sujet. À cette recherche, menée à Bucarest (Roumanie), ont participé 108 psychologues cliniciens, 91 femmes et 17 hommes (âge moyen : 33,9 ans), auxquels a été administrée l’échelle de résilience Connor-Davidson (CD-RISC) à 25 items. La grande dispersion des scores attire l’attention, d’une part, sur la nécessité de l’introduction d’une formation sur la résilience au cours des études universitaires et, d’autre part, sur le développement d’une culture des soins auto-administrés chez les cliniciens.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.045 | 0.008 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".