Deep learning accurately quantifies plasma cell percentages on CD138-stained bone marrow samples
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background The diagnosis of plasma cell neoplasms requires accurate, and ideally precise, percentages. This plasma cell percentage is often determined by visual estimation of CD138-stained bone marrow biopsies and clot sections. While not necessarily inaccurate, estimates are by definition imprecise. For this study, we hypothesized that deep learning can be used to improve precision. Methods We trained a semantic segmentation-based convolutional neural network (CNN) using annotations of CD138+ and CD138− cells provided by one pathologist on small image patches of bone marrow and validated the CNN on an independent test set of images patches using annotations from two pathologists and a non-deep-learning commercial software. Once satisfied with performance, we scaled-up the CNN to evaluate whole slide images (WSIs), and deployed the system as a workflow friendly web application to measure plasma cell percentages using snapshots taken from microscope cameras. Results On validation image patches, we found that the intraclass correlation coefficients for plasma cell percentages between the CNN and pathologist #1, a non-deep learning commercial software and pathologist #1, and pathologists #1 and #2 were 0.975, 0.892, and 0.994, respectively. The overall results show that CNN labels were almost as accurate pathologist labels at a cell-by-cell level. On WSIs from 10 clinical cases, the CNN continued to perform well, and identified two cases where the sign-out pathologist overestimated plasma cell percentages. Conclusions The high labeling accuracy of the CNN supports its eventually application as a computational second-opinion tool for the measurement of plasma cell percentages in clinical practice.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".