Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We have surveyed multiple PageRank implementations available with popular graph processing frameworks, and discovered that they treat sink vertices (i.e., vertices without outgoing edges) incorrectly. This leads to two issues: (i) incorrect PageRank scores, and (ii) flawed performance evaluations (as costly scatter operations are avoided). For synchronous PageRank implementations, a strategy to fix these issues exists (accumu-lating all values from sinks during an algorithmic superstep of a PageRank iteration), albeit with sizeable overhead. This solution, however, is not applicable in the context of asynchronous frameworks. We present and evaluate a novel, low-cost algorithmic solution to address this issue. For asynchronous PageRank, our key target, our solution simply requires an inexpensive O(Vertex) computation performed alongside the final normalization step. We also show that this strategy has advantages over prior work for synchronous PageRank, as it both avoids graph restructuring and reduces inline computation costs by performing a final score reassignment to vertices once at the end of processing.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it