MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4212917125 · doi:10.3917/sr.039.0103

This is the end

2015· article· fr· W4212917125 on OpenAlexaff
Laurent Jullier, Barbara Laborde

Bibliographic record

VenueSociétés & Représentations · 2015
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHealth, Medicine and Society
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Créée en 2003 par Shonda Rhimes, la série médicale Grey’s Anatomy propose un modèle de conduite applicable dans la vie de tous les jours, quand bien même on n’est pas médecin. Ce modèle est celui du care – l’éthique de la sollicitude : si tout un chacun se souciait un peu plus d’autrui et incorporait un peu mieux la constatation selon laquelle on n’est rien sans les autres, le monde tournerait un peu plus rond. C’est ce qui fait de cette série une fiction votive . Cependant, l’aspect conséquentialiste du care impose à la série de se colleter avec le problème des fins – il faut savoir ce qui arrive « à la fin » pour évaluer la justesse d’une décision ou le bien-fondé d’un comportement... L’article explore trois aspects de cette question : (1) finir la série ; (2) faire disparaître un personnage pour des raisons réelles, liées à l’acteur qui l’incarne ; (3) finir un épisode.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.402
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0380.011

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.204
GPT teacher head0.556
Teacher spread0.353 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSociétés & ReprésentationsSame topicHealth, Medicine and SocietyFrench-language works237,207