MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4212918719 · doi:10.1080/17445302.2022.2032993

Full-scale ship-structure ice impact laboratory experiments: experimental apparatus and initial results

2022· article· en· W4212918719 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueShips and Offshore Structures · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
FundersAmerican Bureau of Shipping
KeywordsHullImpactPendulumAccelerationMarine engineeringStructural engineeringEngineeringDuration (music)Full scaleUnderwater explosionGeologyAerospace engineeringPhysicsMechanical engineeringAcoustics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article presents the results of three ice impacts against a stiffened panel cut from the recently decommissioned ex-HMCS IROQUOIS. The upgraded experimental apparatus (the large double-pendulum), its sensors, and experimental conditions are also presented. The apparatus consists of two pendulums, one constrains and supports an ice feature, and the other constrains and supports a ship hull grillage structure. The first ice impact had data integrity and ice cone geometry issues, and so is treated as a commissioning test. During the second impact the impact force peaked at 553.9 kN, the total impact duration was 0.055 s and the hull plating acceleration at the centre of the impacted location was a maximum of 10877 m/s2. The third impact exhibited a peak force of 773.6 kN, 9691 m/s2 of acceleration, and had an impact duration of 0.039 s.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.144
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it