Guérison autochtone en contexte correctionnel canadien : une analyse sociohistorique
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La surreprésentation carcérale des détenus autochtones dans les établissements pénitentiaires canadiens est devenue si importante que le traitement et la gestion de ces derniers sont aujourd’hui des priorités institutionnelles et politiques. Malgré un corpus croissant d’études qui explorent, d’une part, la guérison des traumatismes historiques et, d’autre part, les causes de la surreprésentation, très peu permettent de comprendre sous quelles assises la guérison autochtone a pénétré l’univers carcéral fédéral. Cette recension des écrits de nature exploratoire et narrative vise à reconstruire sociohistoriquement la pénétration et l’usage du principe de guérison dans les politiques correctionnelles canadiennes. Pour chaque phase historique, elle traite la manière dont la guérison autochtone s’est pratiquée et opérationnalisée, en faisant ressortir les paradoxes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.021 | 0.025 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".