CTIMS: Automated Defect Detection Framework Using Computed Tomography
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Non-Destructive Testing (NDT) is one of the inspection techniques used in industrial tool inspection for quality and safety control. It is performed mainly using X-ray Computed Tomography (CT) to scan the internal structure of the tools and detect the potential defects. In this paper, we propose a new toolbox called the CT-Based Integrity Monitoring System (CTIMS-Toolbox) for automated inspection of CT images and volumes. It contains three main modules: first, the database management module, which handles the database and reads/writes queries to retrieve or save the CT data; second, the pre-processing module for registration and background subtraction; third, the defect inspection module to detect all the potential defects (missing parts, damaged screws, etc.) based on a hybrid system composed of computer vision and deep learning techniques. This paper explores the different features of the CTIMS-Toolbox, exposes the performance of its modules, compares its features to some existing CT inspection toolboxes, and provides some examples of the obtained results.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".