HLA: a novel hybrid model based on fixed structure and variable structure learning automata
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Learning Automata (LAs) are adaptive decision-making models designed to find an appropriate action in unknown environments. LAs can be classified into two classes: variable structure and fixed structure. To the best of our knowledge, there is no hybrid model based on both of these classes. In this paper, we propose a model that brings together the benefits of both classes of LAs. In the proposed model, called an HLA, the action switching phase of a fixed structure learning automaton is fused with a variable structure learning automaton. Several computer simulations are conducted to study the performance of the proposed model with respect to the total number of rewards and action switching in addition to the convergence rate. The proposed model is compared to both variable structure and fixed structure learning automata, and in most cases, the numerical results demonstrate its superiority. In order to show the applicability of the HLA, a novel adaptive dropout mechanism in deep neural networks was suggested. The results of the simulations show that the proposed mechanism performs better than the simple dropout mechanism with respect to network accuracy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it