MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4212940128 · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwab049.012

A13 GUT MICROBIOTA MODULATES CGRP PRODUCTION BY DRG NEURONS IN FEMALE MICE

2022· article· en· W4212940128 on OpenAlexaff
Julien Pujo, Giada De Palma, Jianping Lu, Stephen M. Collins, P Bercík

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGastrointestinal motility and disorders
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCapsaicinVisceral painSubstance PCalcitonin gene-related peptideStimulationInternal medicineEndocrinologyAgonistGut floraTRPV1NociceptionReceptorBiologyMedicineNeuropeptideTransient receptor potential channelImmunology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Abdominal pain is a common complaint in patients with chronic gastrointestinal disorders. Accumulating evidence suggests that gut microbiota is an important determinant of gut function, including visceral sensitivity. Germ-free (GF) mice have been shown to display visceral hypersensitivity, which normalizes after colonization. Thus, gut microbiota is involved in the regulation of gut nociception but the underlying mechanisms remain poorly understood. Aims To investigate the role of gut microbiota in abdominal pain. Methods Method: Adult female and male conventionally raised (SPF) or GF mice were used. Their visceral sensitivity was assessed by visceromotor responses to colorectal distension, at baseline (vehicle: Tween 80 10%, Ethanol 10%, saline 80%) and after intracolonic administration of a TRPV1 agonist capsaicin (30 μg), or a mixture of G-protein coupled receptors agonists (GPCR: bradykinin, histamine and serotonin; 30 μg). Neuronal excitability of dorsal root ganglia (DRG) neurons was assessed by calcium imaging using a fluorescent probe Fluo-4 (1 mM) after stimulation with capsaicin (12.5 nM, 125 nM and 1250 nM) or GPCR agonists (0.3 μM, 3 μM and 30 μM). The neuronal production of substance P (SP) and calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) in response to capsaicin (1250 nM) or GPCR agonists (30 μM) was measured by ELISA. Results At baseline, GF male mice exhibited higher responses to colorectal distension compared to SPF males, while SPF and GF females displayed similar visceral sensitivity. In contrast, both intracolonic capsaicin and GPCR agonists increased visceral sensitivity in GF females compared to SPF females, while responses were comparable in male groups. DRG neuronal activation after stimulation with capsaicin or GPCR agonists was similar in SPF and GF mice of both sexes. While stimulated production of SP by DRG neurons was similar in SPF and GF mice, regardless of sex, the production of CGRP in response to GPCR agonists was higher in GF female than SPF female mice. Conclusions Our data suggest that visceral sensitivity in vivo differs according to the gut microbiota status, sex and the activation of TRPV1 and GPCR pathways. At the level of DRG neurons, the absence of gut microbiota does not affect the neuronal activation or production of SP. However, GPCR agonists-stimulated release of CGRP is higher in GF female compared to SPF female mice. All together, our data demonstrate that the gut microbiota modulates visceral sensitivity by regulating the production of CGRP in the sensory neurons, especially in female mice. Further mechanistic studies are needed to investigate the role of gut microbiota in visceral sensitivity. Funding Agencies CIHR

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology→Same topicGastrointestinal motility and disorders→French-language works237,207→