MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4212965396 · doi:10.1002/9781118569184.ch20

Ice Wine

2013· other· en· W4212965396 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Nikolin Musabelliu

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeother
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicFermentation and Sensory Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWineIce creamGrape wineAging of wineVineGeographyHorticultureFood scienceChemistryBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ice wine is a sweet dessert wine that is made from naturally frozen grapes left on the vine. The earliest indications of Ice wine production date from the Roman period. Making Ice wine is a gamble, since winemakers must choose to leave grapes on the vine for a longer period. Climate conditions are the most important factor, and the production of Ice wine happens only if the weather cooperates. The biggest producers of Ice wine worldwide are Austria, Canada and Germany since these countries experience the cold climate conditions that are essential for the production of the wine. Ideally grapes for making Ice wine should be resistant to disease, of an aromatic variety, late ripening, and must have high acidity. The most common grapes used are Cabernet Franc, Riesling and Vidal. This chapter ends with a discussion on vinification process of Ice wine.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.385
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.3900.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicFermentation and Sensory AnalysisFrench-language works237,207