Bibliographic record
Abstract
The irreducible representations of two intermediate Casimir elements associated to the recoupling of three identical irreducible representations of <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="upper U Subscript q Baseline left-parenthesis German s German l Subscript 2 Baseline right-parenthesis"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>U</mml:mi> <mml:mi>q</mml:mi> </mml:msub> <mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:mi mathvariant="fraktur">s</mml:mi> <mml:mi mathvariant="fraktur">l</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn> </mml:msub> <mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">U_q(\mathfrak {sl}_2)</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> are considered. It is shown that these intermediate Casimirs are related by a conjugation involving braid group representations. Consequently, the entries of the braid group matrices are explicitly given in terms of the <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="q"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mi>q</mml:mi> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">q</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula>-Racah polynomials which appear as <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="6 j"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>6</mml:mn> <mml:mi>j</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">6j</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula>-symbols in the Racah problem for <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="upper U Subscript q Baseline left-parenthesis German s German l Subscript 2 Baseline right-parenthesis"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>U</mml:mi> <mml:mi>q</mml:mi> </mml:msub> <mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:mi mathvariant="fraktur">s</mml:mi> <mml:mi mathvariant="fraktur">l</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn> </mml:msub> <mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">U_q(\mathfrak {sl}_2)</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula>. Formulas for these polynomials are derived from the algebraic relations satisfied by the braid group representations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frameâs 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".