MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Practice-Based Evidence in Nutrition (PEN) Knowledge Pathway- Should the Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) nutrition care plan be recommended for overweight, hypertensive children? – A review and update of the literature

2018· review· en· W4212973993 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Heather Resvick

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereview
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicDietetics, Nutrition, and Education
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDashDASH dietMedicineOverweightFamily medicineBody mass indexInternal medicineComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: The effectiveness of the DASH diet for adults is well documented but not well-known in children. Pediatric primary hypertension [PPH] is estimated between 1-3% in Canada and compounded by increasing obesity rates, further emphasizing the need for research in this area. Objectives: a) to update research in PPH and b) to provide RDs with evidence-based therapeutic guidelines. Methods: PEN for Healthy Weight/Obesity-Pediatric/Paediatric, along with the DASH dietary recommendations for management of hypertension in adults were first consulted. Then, a literature review using PubMed, Scopus, and Summon searches were conducted using keywords: hypertension, high blood pressure, overweight, obese*, DASH diet, dietary approaches to stop hypertension, low sodium diet, low salt diet, child*, and adolescent*. Two hundred and eight original research articles were considered. Included were: English publications (2007-2018); specific reference to the DASH diet or elements of DASH; children and adolescents between 9-21 years of age; comorbidities including obesity, diabetes, and metabolic syndrome. Excluded were: animal studies; adult studies; and the use of DASH for medical conditions differing from above. Fifteen full-text articles were obtained and included for PEN grading. Results: Eight studies (53%) demonstrated a reduction in blood pressure using the DASH diet or elements of DASH; one (6%) showed no association; three studies (20%) showed a positive benefit with sodium reduction, two (13%) did not show benefit; and one study (6%) reported that increased dairy intake was beneficial in decreasing hypertension. Conclusion: Research supporting the use of the DASH diet as a therapeutic strategy for PPH remains limited. However, there is convincing evidence that weight reduction, sodium limitation and increased servings of fruit, vegetables, and low-fat dairy may be beneficial. Significance to Dietetics: The DASH nutrition care plan may prove to be an effective tool for patients with PPH; however, DASH may not meet dietary requirements for calcium and vitamin D without RD supervision to ensure nutritional adequacy with this population.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.019
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.074
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.099

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0190.074
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.004
Bibliometrics0.0150.013
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0050.007
Open science0.0030.004
Research integrity0.0040.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.470
GPT teacher head0.445
Teacher spread0.025 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicDietetics, Nutrition, and EducationFrench-language works237,207