MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4212974841 · doi:10.1017/jfm.2022.88

On the transition between continuous and shocked solutions for resonant gas oscillations in the frustum of a closed cone

2022· article· en· W4212974841 on OpenAlexafffund
David E. Amundsen, Michael P. Mortell, Brian R. Seymour

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Fluid Mechanics · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Thermodynamic Systems and Engines
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaCarleton University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsFrustumPhysicsCone (formal languages)MechanicsMach numberAmplitudeShock (circulatory)Mode (computer interface)Connection (principal bundle)Tube (container)Classical mechanicsOpticsGeometryMaterials scienceMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Resonant gas oscillations in a closed straight tube contain shocks for frequencies near the linear resonant frequency. As the tube geometry changes from straight to a cone with slope $a,$ the shock strength decreases until, for large enough $a,$ the motion is continuous. The analytical result for small $a$ follows from a nonlinearization of the linear resonant response, while the result for large $a$ is a dominant single mode approximation. The connection between these two forms is analysed numerically. The shocked solutions change to multimode continuous solutions as $a$ increases to cross the curve $a_{s}\doteqdot 12.8M^{1/3}$ , where $M\ll 1$ is the Mach number of the input. Then the amplitudes of the higher modes decrease as $a$ continues to increase until, having crossed $a_{m}\doteqdot 30M^{1/3}$ , the single mode solution emerges.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Fluid MechanicsSame topicAdvanced Thermodynamic Systems and EnginesFrench-language works237,207