Bibliographic record
Abstract
À la croisée des sciences sociales de l’espace et de l’éducation, l’article explore la manière dont la spatialité des élèves, c’est-à-dire leurs pratiques et orientations spatiales, participe de la construction d’aspirations et de capacités. L’attention est tout particulièrement portée sur les endroits isolés et à faible densité, avec leurs spatialités spécifiques, comparées avec celles propres des lieux à haut degré d’urbanité. L’article est issu d’une enquête qualitative, combinant entretiens semi-directifs et observation, menée dans huit établissements scolaires de l’Académie de Reims, qui diffèrent entre eux par la situation géographique et le public visé. L’enquête a montré comment les pratiques spatiales propres aux différents degrés d’urbanité peuvent avoir une incidence sur la construction de la personnalité, qui comprend le développement de capacités à créer des aspirations à la mobilité sociale et spatiale.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.012 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.018 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".