Le « phénomène d’enchâssement » de l’innovation dans la création à travers la médiation et la médiatisation d’œuvres numériques de David Hockney
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Nous présentons une analyse de la médiation et de la médiatisation d’expositions d’œuvres numériques de David Hockney qui ont, depuis 2010, circulé dans trois lieux (Fondation Pierre Bergé-Yves Saint-Laurent, France, 2010 ; Musée Louisiana, Danemark, 2011 ; Royal Ontario Museum, Canada, 2011-2012), à partir des apports des théories des industries culturelles à l’étude du « phénomène d’enchâssement » de l’innovation dans la création. En amont, nous envisageons comment la médiation et la médiatisation de ces expositions supposent l’association du nom de l’artiste avec celui de l’outil qu’il utilise (iPhone, iPad) et situons alors les risques de confusion de l’attribution du nom avec une marque. En aval, nous exposons les démarches de David Hockney liées à la médiation de son art.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.015 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".