MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4212980997 · doi:10.1016/j.xjtc.2021.12.022

Commentary: We are talking about a vessel and not just a pipe

2022· editorial· en· W4212980997 on OpenAlexaff
Hugo Issa, Marc Ruel

Bibliographic record

VenueJTCVS Techniques · 2022
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac and Coronary Surgery Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCardiologyInternal medicineStenosisAnastomosisArteryCoronary artery bypass surgeryInternal thoracic arteryRevascularizationCardiac surgeryCardiothoracic surgerySurgeryMyocardial infarction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The string sign is a diffuse narrowing of arterial grafts used for surgical revascularization without significant stenosis of an anastomosis.1 It is an adaptation of the arterial graft as a function of myocardial demands and competitive flow. Arterial grafts can dilate and therefore increase their flow in response to increased metabolic demands of the myocardium, or when the degree of stenosis in the coronary increases and vice versa (Figure 1).2,3

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.030
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.041
Threshold uncertainty score0.075

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.030
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.004
Scholarly communication0.0030.006
Open science0.0040.002
Research integrity0.0410.047
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0220.015

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJTCVS TechniquesSame topicCardiac and Coronary Surgery TechniquesFrench-language works237,207