Social isolation and Life satisfaction mediating the association of ADL and mild cognitive impairment in rural older adults:A multi-group SEM with latent response variable mediation analysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background: There are many studies on the relationship between daily activity ability (ADL) and mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and only the discussion of the relationship between ADL and MCI. However, the mechanism of the potential difference is very important to reduce the impact of cognitive dysfunction in later life. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether social isolation and life satisfaction mediated the relationship between ADL and MCI in the older adults.Methods: A village-based cross-sectional study was conducted among 2,933 older adults people over 60 years old from Shandong Province, China. ADL, MCI, social isolation and life satisfaction were respectively assessed using the daily living capacity scale for Chinese, the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) tool, the LSNS 6 scale and the Satisfaction with Life Scale questionnaire. The multi-group SEM with latent response variable method was conducted to evaluate the association between ADL and MCI mediated by social isolation and life satisfaction.Results: The study found that daily activity ability was negatively correlated with mild cognitive impairment in the older adults. Further analysis of mediating effect found that social isolation and life satisfaction had a partial mediating effect between ADL and MCI in the older adults.Conclusion: These results indicated that social isolation and life satisfaction may act as a partial mediator in the relationship between ADL and MCI, and the mediating effect of social isolation was more pronounced than that of life satisfaction.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.009 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".