MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4212985827 · doi:10.24843/ach.2021.v08.i03.p10

PENGETAHUAN MENGENAI GARAM BERIODIUM PADA IBU RUMAH TANGGA DI WILAYAH KERJA PUSKESMAS TAMPAKSIRING I

2022· article· id· W4212985827 on OpenAlexaff
Kadek Nuansa Putri Wulandari, Ni Ketut Sutiari

Bibliographic record

VenueARCHIVE OF COMMUNITY HEALTH · 2022
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldMedicine
TopicPublic Health and Nutrition
Canadian institutionsWiLAN (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRAK Universal Salt Iozation merupakan strategi untuk mengurangi defisiensi iodium dengan menambahkan iodium kedalam garam. Dalam evaluasi kinerja gizi tahun 2020 Bali termasuk dalam Provinsi yang masih rendah pada konsumsi garam beriodium yaitu sebesar 80,6% dari target 82%. Cakupan penggunaan garam beriodium akan dipengaruhi oleh tingkat pengetahuan masyarakat mengenai garam beriodium. Tujuan penelitian ini untuk mengetahui pengetahuan Ibu Rumah Tangga mengenai garam beriodium di wilayah kerja Puskesmas Tampaksiring I. Jenis penelitian ini adalah deskriptif kuantitatif dengan pendekatan cross-sectional. Populasi penelitian yaitu ibu rumah tangga yang berada di wilayah kerja Puskesmas Tampaksiring I dengan sampel sebanyak 111. Pengambilan sampel dilakukan dengan accidental sampling. Teknik pengumpulan data menggunakan wawancara dan observasi. Instrumen penelitian menggunakan kuesioner dan checklist. Dilaksanakan pada April - Juni 2021 dan dianalisis menggunakan Analisis Univariat. Hasil penelitian ini memperoleh mayoritas tamat SMP (25,2%) dan 75,7% sebagai Ibu Rumah Tangga (IRT). Sebesar 55,9% responden sudah menggunakan garam beriodium dan 59,5% responden memiliki pengetahuan baik mengenai garam beriodium.Kata Kunci: Pengetahuan, Garam Beriodium, Ibu Rumah Tangga

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score0.078

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0230.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.325
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueARCHIVE OF COMMUNITY HEALTHSame topicPublic Health and NutritionFrench-language works237,207