EARLY INTAKES OF ENERGY AND MACRONUTRIENTS ARE ASSOCIATED WITH COGNITIVE DEVELOPMENT AT 6.5 YEARS OF AGE IN EXTREMELY PRETERM INFANTS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background and AimsFICare promotes parent-infant interaction in the NICU and includes staff and parent education programs, peer-to-peer parent support, and adaptation of unit policies and procedures to enable more parent participation in infant care. FICare was evaluated in a cluster-randomized controlled trial (cRCT) in 14 intervention and 12 control NICUs in Canada, Australia, and New Zealand. Results indicated that total maternal stress and anxiety were decreased with FICare. This analysis examined how FICare affected measures of parental stress and anxiety. Our hypothesis was that the measured difference in the total stress score in the FICare arm of the cRCT would be attributable to changes in parental role. Furthermore, we hypothesized that the change in total anxiety score would parallel the changes in stress.MethodThis study utilized data previously collected from a cRCT of the FICare model. Eligible infants were born less than 33 weeks gestational age, were on no or low-level respiratory support, and had a caregiver able to commit to spending at least 6 hours per day with the infant.ResultsThere were significant differences between the control and FICare groups for some variables (Table 1). Post-intervention, total maternal stress scores in all three subscales and total anxiety scores and subscales were significantly different between control and FICare groups (Table 2). These differences remained significant after adjustment for maternal demographic variables. ConclusionFICare affected all subscales of parental stress and anxiety scores, but most significantly affected the parental role subscale. This analysis provides further support for implementation of FICare.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".