MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4212993215 · doi:10.3917/presa.201.0035

Demain l’Afrique : par les femmes et avec les femmes

2022· article· fr· W4212993215 on OpenAlexaff
Gertrude Mianda

Bibliographic record

VenuePrésence Africaine · 2022
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMulticulturalism, Politics, Migration, Gender
Canadian institutionsWomen's and Gender Studies et Recherches Féministes
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cette contribution se propose de revenir sur l’apport de la philosophie politique aux études européennes. L’Union européenne pose à la philosophie moderne de redoutables difficultés, qui tiennent d’abord à l’identification de sa forme politique. Mais à cette dimension explicative s’adjoint une dimension normative : il s’agit de dégager quelle serait pour l’Union la forme adéquate de souveraineté et de gouvernement qui pourrait lui convenir. Dans cette mesure, la philosophie politique peut espérer énoncer les principes qui doivent l’organiser de manière légitime – principes qui orientent l’amélioration de ses institutions en visant la démocratie, la liberté et la justice.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.063
Threshold uncertainty score0.125

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0090.005
Scholarly communication0.0040.005
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0020.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.171
GPT teacher head0.398
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venuePrésence AfricaineSame topicMulticulturalism, Politics, Migration, GenderFrench-language works237,207