The Hurons of Wendake/Lorette: A History of Intercultural Integration
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Hurons of Wendake are one of the rare Indigenous groups that still hold official claims to their territory in North America. Why so many Indigenous tribes failed to do the same has been extensively discussed in literature. However, little attention has been paid to the Hurons of Wendake who have maintained strong political, social, and economic power within the European dominated Saint Lawrence Valley upon their arrival in 1697. The Huron’s capacity to take in the culture of their French allies to their advantage to strengthen their authority over their economy and their lands is what differentiates this group from other Indigenous nations. Their Catholic schooling system, their artwork tailored to the European’s needs and preferences, as well as their sustained role as uncles of the seven fires confederacy allowed the Hurons to gain an intermediary role within North America between the settlers and Indigenous groups. This role gave them sufficient kinship ties with both Europeans and Indigenous groups to navigate through all social and economic systems coexisting at the time, and ultimately, to hold strong political, social, and economic power in the Saint Lawrence Valley.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.024 | 0.022 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".