Far-ultraviolet to FIR Spectral-energy Distribution Modeling of the Stellar Formation History of the M31 Bulge
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract M31 is being surveyed at far- and near-ultraviolet with the UVIT telescope on AstroSat. The central bulge of M31 was observed in the N279N (275–280 nm), N219M (200–240 nm), F172M (160–185 nm), F169M (145–175 nm), and F148W (120–180 nm) filters. These images are made publicly available here. The UVIT data are supplemented with Sloan Digital Sky Survey data in optical, Spitzer data in near-infrared and Herschel data in mid- and far-infrared. The resulting far-ultraviolet to IR spectral-energy distributions for the bulge and for 10 subregions, are modeled using combinations of simple stellar populations and with CIGALE models. We find a dominant old (10–12 Gyr) metal-rich ([Z/H] ∼ 0.3) population and a younger (600 Myr) solar abundance ([Z/H] ∼ 0) population throughout the bulge. For the innermost 120″ we find an additional very young (25 Myr) metal-poor ([Z/H] ∼ −0.7) population. The results are consistent with the most recent stellar population studies of the bulge, which find the two populations for the whole bulge and a third young population in the innermost bulge.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".