MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4213003302 · doi:10.5864/d2021-023

Microbiological evaluation of Vietnamese Pho ingredients in Toronto

2021· article· en· W4213003302 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
David S. Di, Richard Meldrum, Eric N. Liberda

Bibliographic record

VenueEnvironmental Health Review · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicFood Safety and Hygiene
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVietnameseFood scienceFood safetySample (material)ContaminationToxicologyBiotechnologyBiologyChemistryEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Beef and bean sprouts have often been implicated in foodborne illness (FBI) outbreaks. The traditional Vietnamese dish, Pho, uses both as its main ingredients and, therefore, presents significant concerns from a food safety perspective. The present study investigated food safety concerns associated with Pho through the detection of total coliform and Escherichia coli. Methods: Thirty-two Vietnamese restaurants in Toronto, Ontario, Canada, were selected for the study based on inclusion criteria. All restaurant operators were briefed prior to sampling and were informed that their consent and participation were voluntary. Fourteen restaurants consented to providing samples and allowing their broth temperatures to be taken. Three types of samples were obtained from each location: raw beef (RB), cooked beef (CB), and bean sprouts (BS). All samples were couriered to an accredited laboratory for microbiological analysis via 3M petrifilm E. coli/coliform count plates. Based on reported total coliform count (TCC), locations were segmented into low, medium, and high contamination categories. Subsequent correlational analysis were conducted based on lab detection data to identify potential links between E. coli count (ECC) and TCC, TCC and broth temperature, and ECC and broth temperature. In addition, an ANOVA was performed to examine for differences in TCC by sample types, differences in TCC by suppliers, differences in ECC by sample types, differences in ECC by suppliers, and differences in TCC by location types. Results: ANOVA indicated a significant effect of sample type on TCC for all three different sample types, with post hoc comparisons elucidating significantly lower TCC in CB and RB samples, compared with BS samples. Subsequent analysis further indicated the significant effect of location category on TCC, with post hoc comparisons demonstrating significantly higher TCC in Category 3 locations compared to Category 1 and 2 locations. All other analysis yielded nonstatistically significant results. Conclusion: This study presented significant findings in linking Pho ingredients to potential food safety concerns. Specifically, temperature control was identified as a possible cause for high TCC and E. coli detection at select restaurants. Although analysis involving E. coli did not yield any significant results, any E. coli found on ready-to-eat food at a restaurant is problematic from a food safety perspective. Based on the results, we recommended policy changes to incentivize restaurants to maintain high hygienic standards and improve efficiency of the public health inspection process.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.975
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnvironmental Health ReviewSame topicFood Safety and HygieneFrench-language works237,207