MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4213006204 · doi:10.5539/ijsp.v11n2p8

Alpha Power Poisson-G Distribution With an Application to Bur XII Distribution Lifetime Data

2022· article· en· W4213006204 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Jemilohun Vincent Gbenga, Ipinyomi Reuben Adeyemi

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Statistics and Probability · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicStatistical Distribution Estimation and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsLorenz curveApplied mathematicsQuantile functionPoisson distributionQuantileEstimatorExponential distributionOrder statisticMoment (physics)StatisticsMonte Carlo methodExponential functionExponential familyMoment-generating functionL-momentProbability density functionMathematical analysisGini coefficient

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We propose a new method of adding two shape parameters to a family of distributions for more flexibility and wider scope of applications called Alpha power Poisson-g distribution. A special case has been considered in details namely; one parameter exponential distribution. Various properties of the proposed distribution, including explicit expressions for the moments, quantiles, moment generating function, mean and median deviation, Bonferroni and Lorenz curve, order statistics and expression of the Renyi entropies are derived. The maximum likelihood estimators of unknown parameters cannot be obtained in explicit forms, and they have to be obtained by solving non-linear equations only. Further we consider an extension of the two-parameter Bur XII distribution also, mainly for data analysis purposes. Three data sets have been analyzed to show how the proposed models work in practice. We also carried out Monte Carlo simulation to further investigate the properties of the proposed method of estimation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.885
Threshold uncertainty score0.543

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.357
Teacher spread0.316 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Statistics and ProbabilitySame topicStatistical Distribution Estimation and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207