MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4213013840 · doi:10.1161/circ.138.suppl_2.160

Abstract 160: End-Tidal Carbon Dioxide > 20mmHg During Pediatric In-Hospital Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation is not Associated With Survival

2018· article· en· W4213013840 on OpenAlexaff
Robert A. Berg, Ronald W Reeder, Kathleen L. Meert, Andrew R. Yates, John Berger, Christopher J. L. Newth, Joseph A. Carcillo, Patrick S. McQuillen, Rick Harrison, Frank W. Moler, Murray M. Pollack, Todd C. Carpenter, Daniel A. Notterman, Richard Holubkov, Michael Dean, Vinay Nadkarni, Robert M Sutton

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
Canadian institutionsBerger (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineReturn of spontaneous circulationCardiopulmonary resuscitationQuartileResuscitationEmergency medicineAnesthesiaInternal medicineConfidence interval

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Based on laboratory CPR investigations and limited adult data, the American Heart Association Consensus Statement on CPR Quality recommends titrating end-tidal carbon dioxide (ETCO2) to > 20 mmHg during CPR. Hypothesis: ETCO2 > 20 mmHg during pediatric in-hospital CPR is associated with survival to hospital discharge. Methods: Children > 37 weeks gestation in Collaborative Pediatric Critical Care Research Network intensive care units with chest compressions for > 1 minute and ETCO2 monitoring prior to and during CPR between July 1, 2013 and June 31, 2016 were included. ETCO2 and Utstein-style cardiac arrest data were collected. Multivariable Poisson regression models with robust error estimates were used to estimate relative risk of outcomes. Results: Investigators blinded to outcome analyzed ETCO2 waveforms from 43 children for the first (up to) 10 minutes of CPR. During CPR, the median ETCO2 was 23 mmHg (quartiles, 16 and 28 mmHg), median ventilation rate was 29 breaths/minute (quartiles, 24 and 35 bpm), and median duration of CPR was 5 minutes [quartiles, 2 and 16 minutes]. Return of spontaneous circulation occurred after 71% of CPR events and 37% of patients survived to hospital discharge. For children with mean ETCO2 during CPR > 20 mmHg, the adjusted relative risk for return of spontaneous circulation was 1.32 (0.89, 1.95), p= 0.16 and for survival to hospital discharge was 0.92 (0.41, 2.08), p= 0.84. Further sensitivity analyses were unable to demonstrate an association between mean ETCO2 > 25 mmHg or > 30 mmHg and ROSC or survival to hospital discharge. The median mean ETCO2 among children who survived to hospital discharge was 20 mmHg [quartiles; 15, 28 mmHg] versus 23 mmHg [16, 28 mmHg] among non-survivors. Conclusion: Mean ETCO2 > 20 mmHg during pediatric in-hospital CPR was not associated with ROSC or survival to hospital discharge. ETCO2 was not demonstrably different among survivors versus non-survivors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculation→Same topicCardiac Arrest and Resuscitation→French-language works237,207→