Calcium scoring in low-dose ungated chest CT scans using convolutional long-short term memory networks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We aimed to develop a novel deep-learning based method for automatic coronary artery calcium (CAC) quantification in low-dose ungated computed tomography attenuation correction maps (CTAC). In this study, we used convolutional long-short -term memory deep neural network (conv-LSTM) to automatically derive coronary artery calcium score (CAC) from both standard CAC scans and low-dose ungated scans (CT-attenuation correction maps). We trained convLSTM to segment CAC using 9543 scans. A U-Net model was trained as a reference method. Both models were validated in the OrCaCs dataset (n=32) and in the held-out cohort (n=507) without prior coronary interventions who had CTAC standard CAC scan acquired contemporarily. Cohen's kappa coefficients and concordance matrices were used to assess agreement in four CAC score categories (very low: <10, low:10-100; moderate:101-400 and high >400). The median time to derive results on a central processing unit (CPU) was significantly shorter for the conv-LSTM model- 6.18s (inter quartile range [IQR]: 5.99, 6.3) than for UNet (10.1s, IQR: 9.82, 15.9s, p<0.0001). The memory consumption during training was much lower for our model (13.11Gb) in comparison with UNet (22.31 Gb). Conv-LSTM performed comparably to UNet in terms of agreement with expert annotations, but with significantly shorter inference times and lower memory consumption.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".