MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4213022493 · doi:10.5267/j.ac.2022.1.002

Determinant of net interest income of commercial banks in Indonesia

2022· article· en· W4213022493 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
R. Mahelan Prabantarikso, Zaenal Abidin, Edian Fahmy, Mayda Tyastika, Amabel Nabila

Bibliographic record

VenueAccounting · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicBanking stability, regulation, efficiency
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVariance decomposition of forecast errorsError correction modelTrade creditInterest rateVariable (mathematics)Balance of tradeBusinessBalance sheetEconomicsMonetary economicsEconometricsFinanceInternational economicsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study aims to identify the factors that contribute to the formation of Net interest income (NII) for commercial banks in Indonesia in the short and long-term using the Vector Error Correction Model (VECM). The results showed that in the short term all variables in each period tend to adjust to achieve long-term balance. In the short term, the variables that affect NII are credit and NPL of large and retail trade, construction credit, transportation credit and NPL warehousing and communication, as well as lending rate facility. While in the variable length figures that affect NII are credit variables and NPL large and retail trade, Credit and NPL Transportation, warehousing and communication, other credit and Third-Party Funds (Deposit) collected. The analysis of Impulse Response Function can be proven that NII most quickly achieves stability when dealing with the shocks of large trade and retail NPL. Meanwhile, in the Forecasting Variance Decomposition analysis, it can be concluded that the variable that gives the greatest contribution to NII is the amount of construction credit.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.435

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAccountingSame topicBanking stability, regulation, efficiencyFrench-language works237,207