MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4213025639 · doi:10.1186/s12885-021-09022-w

Correction to: Attention to principles of exercise training: an updated systematic review of randomized controlled trials in cancers other than breast and prostate

2022· erratum· en· W4213025639 on OpenAlexaff
Kelcey A. Bland, Sarah Neil‐Sztramko, Kendra Zadravec, Mary E. Medysky, Jeffrey Kong, Kerri M. Winters‐Stone, Kristin L. Campbell

Bibliographic record

VenueBMC Cancer · 2022
Typeerratum
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCancer survivorship and care
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia HospitalMcMaster UniversityUniversity of British ColumbiaImpact
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineRandomized controlled trialSurgical oncologyMedical physicsAlternative medicineMEDLINEPhysical therapyOncologyInternal medicinePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Medicine, Faculty of

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Direct model labels (unvalidated)

Per-model category and study-design labels from the labeling rounds. They are machine output, unvalidated, and the disagreement between models ships as data. No study design here is MEDLINE-validated yet.

Model armCategoriesStudy designConfidence
gemmano category
Domain: not available · Genre: Other
About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no
Systematic reviewlow
gptno category
Domain: not available · Genre: Other
About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no
Not applicablelow
models splitAgreement compares identical category sets and study designs across arms.

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.065
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.404
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.065
Threshold uncertainty score0.345

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0650.404
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0050.004
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0110.007
Bibliometrics0.0110.014
Science and technology studies0.0030.004
Scholarly communication0.0080.006
Open science0.0080.004
Research integrity0.0110.017
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0620.018

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.335
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Labeled directly by 2 models reading the full record.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.

The models disagree on parts of this classification; every voice is preserved in the section at the end of the page.

Study designSystematic review · Not applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBMC CancerSame topicCancer survivorship and careFrench-language works237,207