MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4213039994 · doi:10.1111/bjh.18077

Optimizing transfusion therapy for survivors of Haemoglobin Bart's hydrops fetalis syndrome: Defining the targets for <scp>haemoglobin‐H</scp> fraction and “functional” haemoglobin level

2022· article· en· W4213039994 on OpenAlexaff
Ali Amid, Nick Barrowman, Isaac Odame, Melanie Kirby‐Allen

Bibliographic record

VenueBritish Journal of Haematology · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHemoglobinopathies and Related Disorders
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick ChildrenChildren's Hospital of Eastern OntarioBC Children's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHydrops fetalisMedicineHaemolysisTransfusion therapyLactate dehydrogenaseThalassemiaHemoglobinopathyExchange transfusionGastroenterologySoluble transferrin receptorPathophysiologyBlood transfusionInternal medicinePediatricsAnemiaImmunologyHemolytic anemiaChemistryGestationIron deficiencyPregnancyEnzymeBiologyBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Owing to the unique pathophysiology of anaemia in haemoglobin Bart's hydrops fetalis (HBHF), a transfusion strategy based on beta-thalassemia guidelines is suboptimal for chronically transfused HBHF patients. A more aggressive transfusion aimed at reducing the proportion of non-functional HbH and improving the "functional" haemoglobin (f-Hb) can lead to reduced haemolysis and improved tissue oxygenation. However, the optimal transfusion targets for these parameters are not yet defined. In this retrospective, longitudinal study on four chronically transfused patients with HBHF, we used receiver operating characteristic curves to find a pre-transfusion f-Hb of 106 g/l and a HbH of 16.1% to be the optimal thresholds to achieve a normal soluble transferrin receptor and lactate dehydrogenase, respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.762
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBritish Journal of HaematologySame topicHemoglobinopathies and Related DisordersFrench-language works237,207