MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4213048540 · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwab049.053

A54 DIETARY COMPONENTS ARE ASSOCIATED WITH FECAL CALPROTECTIN IN ULCERATIVE COLITIS

2022· article· en· W4213048540 on OpenAlexaffabout
Elaine Chiu, Lorian Taylor, R Ingram, Remo Panaccione, Subrata Ghosh, Hena R. Ramay, Kathy D. McCoy, Raylene A. Reimer, Maitreyi Raman

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInflammatory Bowel Disease
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCalprotectinUlcerative colitisMedicineLogistic regressionInternal medicineGastroenterologyFecesCohortProspective cohort studyBody mass indexInflammatory bowel diseaseDiseaseBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Ulcerative colitis (UC) is thought to arise from dysregulated immune responses due to intestinal dysbiosis and altered epithelial barrier function. Dietary components may affect the gut microbiome and contribute to either inflammation or its resolution. The relationship between diet and disease activity in UC warrants further investigation. Aims This prospective cohort study explored the relationship between dietary components, and markers of disease activity: fecal calprotectin (FCP) and partial Mayo score (PMS) in patients with UC. Methods 40 participants were recruited from University of Calgary IBD clinics. Study staff obtained two 24-hour diet recalls using the validated automated self administered (ASA)-24 and captured PMS at baseline (T1) and follow-up at week 12 (T2). FCP samples were collected at T1 and T2. Diet variables included adjusted macro/micronutrients (n=44), food groups (n=36) and the validated Canadian healthy eating index-2009 (CHEI) where higher scores reflect healthier intake. CHEI captures intake of dark green and orange foods (DGO) and moderation scoring (MOD) of saturated fats (SF), sodium and added sugars. Higher CHEI scores result from increased intake of DGO and lower intake of SF, sodium and added sugars (higher MOD score). Associations with outcome variables were examined at T1 and T2 individually and across both timepoints (BT). Mixed effect logistic regression models identified relationships between dietary variables, FCP and PMS. Models were adjusted for age, sex, BMI, medications, probiotics, and for repeated measures in both timepoint analyses. Results A positive association was identified between FCP as a continuous variable and SF (T1:Coef=0.22, p_adj=0.02) and a negative association identified between FCP with citrus/melon/berries (BT:Coef=-1.01, p_adj =0.04), total sugars (BT:Coef=-0.06, p_adj=0.025) and HEI (BT:Coef=-0.13, p_adj =0.06 and T1 coef=-0.18, p_adj =7.0 e-5). FCP increased as SF (-0.30,p_adj=0.01), DGO (-0.60, p_adj=0.02), and MOD (-0.21, p_adj=0.02) scores decreased. The presence of inflammation (as a binary variable, FCP >250) was negatively associated with higher fiber intake (BT: Odds Ratio (OR)= 0.016, CI(0.001,0.40) p_adj=0.08). For PMS as a continuous variable, HEI had a negative association with PMS (T2: -0.05, p_adj=0.06). With PMS as a discrete score (remission=PMS<2) there was no significant association with any diet components. Conclusions This study suggests that a healthier diet, both in overall pattern and specific dietary components, was associated with lower FCP and PMS. Our findings related to SF, citrus/melons/berries, and DGO parallel the IOIBD dietary guidelines. Future research should explore through controlled intervention studies whether modifying dietary patterns and components independently reduces disease activity. Funding Agencies Crohn’s and Colitis Foundation

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology→Same topicInflammatory Bowel Disease→French-language works237,207→