MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4213063167 · doi:10.7202/1085527ar

La spiritualité et le travail social

2021· article· fr· W4213063167 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Jacques Cherblanc, Christiane Bergeron‐Leclerc, Geneviève Gauthier

Bibliographic record

VenueNouvelles pratiques sociales · 2021
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicReligion, Society, and Development
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Chicoutimi
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSociologyHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Les relations entre spiritualité et travail social sont de plus en plus étudiées. Cette revue narrative systématisée a pour objectif d’étudier ces relations, à partir de l’analyse de 225 articles parus entre 1990 et 2019. Ce texte met en évidence trois types de liens unissant spiritualité et travail social : la signification de la spiritualité en travail social, l’intégration de la spiritualité dans les pratiques du travail social et l’intégration de la spiritualité dans la formation au travail social.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.018
Scholarly communication0.0060.005
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.343
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNouvelles pratiques socialesSame topicReligion, Society, and DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207