Case report of a novel mutation in Bruton’s tyrosine kinase gene with confirmed agammaglobulinemia and absent B lymphocytes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: X-linked agammaglobulinemia type 1 (XLA) is one of the most common pediatric inborn errors of immunity affecting the humoral immune system. The condition is caused by a mutation in the Bruton’s tyrosine kinase gene (BTK), located in the long arm of the X-chromosome. BTK is crucial for B lymphocyte differentiation and activation. Therefore, a defect in BTK results in B lymphocyte maturation arrest, absence of plasma cells, and failure of immunoglobulin production. XLA affected individuals present with a history of frequent severe pyogenic infections such as pneumonia, conjunctivitis, otitis media, and bacteremia. Laboratory evaluation classically reveals undetectable immunoglobulins and the absence of B cells. The mainstay treatment is immunoglobulin replacement which can be administered intravenously (IVIG) or subcutaneously (SCIG). Aggressive antimicrobial treatment is also administered to reduce complications such as bronchiectasis or invasive bacterial infections during active infections. Aim: To report the clinical presentation, immune features, and genetic mutation in a case of a four-year-old boy with a novel mutation in the BTK gene leading to XLA. Results: The patient’s chart was reviewed. We describe the phenotypical and diagnostic characteristics of an established case in a four-year-old boy who suffered from recurrent infections. Genetic analysis revealed a pathogenic novel mutation in the BTK gene (c.1953C>A; p.Tyr651*), while flow cytometry found 0% CD19+ (B cells), and low serum Ig levels. Discussion: We report the clinical presentation, immune features, and genetic mutation in a patient with a novel mutation in the BTK gene causing XLA. Genetic analysis along with patient history, physical examination, and laboratory results are necessary to identify and diagnose XLA associated with pathogenic mutations in the BTK gene. Statement of novelty: We present an established case of a novel mutation in the BTK gene (c.1953C>A; p.Tyr651*), based on genetic analysis, absent CD19+cells (B cells), and low Ig serum levels.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.007 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".