Hélène Frédérick, Étudier la culture du banquier
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Hélène Frédérick est née au Québec en 1976.Elle est l'auteure de trois romans publiés chez Verticales en France et chez Héliotrope en Amérique du Nord: La poupée de Kokoschka (2010) Forêt contraire (2014), La nuit sauve (2019).Elle a également fait paraître un recueil de poésie, Plans sauvages (2016) à L'Oie de Cravan.Elle vit à Paris.Julien Lefort-Favreau : Nous avons eu envie de vous parler, Hélène, parce que vos trois romans abordent de manière singulière la question du pouvoir, parce que celle-ci les traverse sans pour autant être assignable, sans jamais faire l'objet d'une dénonciation ou d'une critique explicite ou didactique.Le premier mot sur lequel j'aimerais vous lancer, pour aborder La poupée de Kokoschka, est "émancipation".Cette idée est au cœur de votre travail, et permet, me semble-t-il, de nourrir la réflexion qui nous anime, Aurélie et moi, pour ce numéro sur les rapports entre fictions et pouvoir.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.015 | 0.011 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".