Domínios de competências essenciais nas práticas colaborativas em equipe interprofissional: revisão integrativa da literatura
Bibliographic record
Abstract
O objetivo desta pesquisa foi sintetizar evidências das práticas colaborativas interprofissionais segundo os domínios de competências essenciais do Canadian Interprofessional Health Collaborative (CIHC). Foi conduzida revisão integrativa da literatura, dos últimos dez anos, nas bases Pubmed, Web of Science e Biblioteca Virtual em Saúde e síntese das práticas segundo a estrutura proposta pela CIHC. Dos 364 artigos selecionados, 21 foram incluídos com amostras entre 12 e 972 participantes; 11 estudos utilizaram instrumentos para avaliação das práticas; 43% evidenciaram os seis domínios essenciais; e 38%, de três a quatro. A resolução de conflitos interprofissionais não foi abordada em 48% dos artigos. Foi observada a adesão aos domínios de competências essenciais, o que tende a qualificar o processo de trabalho. Entretanto, a lacuna observada na abordagem do enfrentamento dos conflitos interprofissionais representa um obstáculo para vencer a formação uniprofissional.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.011 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.048 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".