Operational Scheduling of Behind-the-Meter Storage Systems Based on Multiple Nonstationary Decomposition and Deep Convolutional Neural Network for Price Forecasting
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the competitive electricity market, electricity price reflects the relationship between power supply and demand and plays an important role in the strategic behavior of market players. With the development of energy storage systems after watt-hour meter, accurate price prediction becomes more and more crucial in the energy management and control of energy storage systems. Due to the great uncertainty of electricity price, the performance of the general electricity price forecasting models is not satisfactory to be adopted in practice. Therefore, in this paper, we propose a novel electricity price forecasting strategy applied in optimization for the scheduling of battery energy storage systems. At first, multiple nonstationary decompositions are presented to extract the most significant components in price series, which express remarkably discriminative features in price fluctuation for regression prediction. In addition, all extracted components are delivered to a devised deep convolution neural network with multiscale dilated kernels for multistep price forecasting. At last, more advanced price fluctuation detection serves the optimized operation of the battery energy storage system within Ontario grid-connected microgrids. Sufficient ablation studies showed that our proposed price forecasting strategy provides predominant performances compared with the state-of-the-art methods and implies a promising prospect in economic benefits of battery energy storage systems.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".