Aging in the Community: Utilizing Community Based Participatory Research to Identify and Address the Housing Needs of LGBTQ2S+ Seniors
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper reports on the findings from a participatory research project exploring the housing needs and experiences of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer, Two-Spirit, and Non-Binary (LGBTQ2S+) individuals. The aim of this project was to better understand the perspectives of LGBTQ2S+ Seniors in Calgary and to present recommendations for housing and service providers. This community based participatory research project engaged peer researchers to conduct a community survey with LGBTQ2S+ seniors and interview various stakeholders working in or representing the intersection of housing, seniors, and LGBTQ2S+ people. Study findings from both the qualitative and quantitative phases of the research have been organized conceptually around three main themes identified by survey respondents and key stakeholders: 1). housing experiences of LGBTQ2S+ seniors; 2). experiences of discrimination and marginalization; and 3). inclusive housing for LGBTQ2S+ seniors. Housing policy and strategies for LGBTQ2S+ populations are identified and discussed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.045 | 0.021 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.014 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.012 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".