Use of Vancomycin Powder in Spinal Deformity Surgery in Cerebral Palsy Patients is Associated With Proteus Surgical Site Infections
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: Surgical site infection (SSI) rates in pediatric spinal deformity surgery for cerebral palsy (CP) patients are higher than that in idiopathic scoliosis. The use of vancomycin powder is associated with decreased risk of SSI in neuromuscular patients. Prior studies in adult and pediatric early-onset scoliosis patients have shown that vancomycin powder alters microbacterial profile in patients that develop SSI. However, the effects of topical vancomycin powder on microbiology in spinal deformity surgery for CP patients has not been studied. METHODS: An international multicenter database of CP neuromuscular scoliosis patients was used in this retrospective cohort study. All patients that underwent posterior spinal instrumented fusion for CP neuromuscular scoliosis from 2008 to 2019 were queried, and 50 cases complicated by postoperative SSI were identified. Intraoperative antibiotic details were documented in 49 cases (98.0%). Microbiology details were documented in 45 cases (91.8%). Microbiology for patients that received topical vancomycin powder were compared with patients that did not. A multivariate regression model was used to control for potential confounders. RESULTS: There were 45 patients included in this study. There were 27 males (60.0%) and 18 females (40.0%). Mean age at surgery was 14.8±2.4 years. There were 24 patients that received topical vancomycin powder (53.3%). The mean time from index surgery to SSI was 4.3±11.3 months.On univariate analysis of microbiology cultures by vancomycin powder cohort, there were no significant differences in culture types. Proteus spp. trended on significance with association with vancomycin powder use (P=0.078). When controlling for potential confounders on multivariate analysis, intraoperative topical vancomycin powder was associated with increased risk for proteus infection (adjusted odds ratio: 262.900, 95% confidence interval: 1.806-38,267.121, P=0.028). DISCUSSION: In CP patients undergoing pediatric spinal deformity surgery, the use of vancomycin powder was independently associated with increased risk for proteus infections. Further study into antibiotic regimens for spinal deformity surgery in the CP population should be performed. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III-retrospective cohort study.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".