MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4213087350 · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-1341575/v1

Clinical efficacy and feasibility of simple navigation technology with an ordinary laser pen and surgical instrument box in open-wedge high tibial osteotomy

2022· preprint· en· W4213087350 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Zhe Xu, Guang Tian, Ruguo Zhang, Zhanyu Wu, Chen Liu, Chuan Ye

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch Square · 2022
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTotal Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersHealth Commission of Guizhou Province
KeywordsWOMACMedicineHigh tibial osteotomyOsteoarthritisSurgeryVisual analogue scaleNuclear medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background: The clinical outcomes of open-wedge high-tibial osteotomy (OWHTO) for medial knee osteoarthritis depend mainly on the precision of correction. The present study aimed to determine the efficacy and feasibility of simple navigation technology with an ordinary laser pen and surgical instrument box.Methods: Seventy-one patients were randomly divided into the navigation (n=36) and traditional groups (n=35). In the navigation group, the hip, knee (Fujisawa point), and ankle centers were located preoperatively using the lid of the surgical instrument box. The leg was aligned with an ordinary laser pen. Radiation exposure, operative time and cost, required labor and postoperative complications were evaluated. The visual analog scale (VAS) and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) scores were recorded. After 24 months, the femoral tibial angle (FTA), medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA), posterior slope angle (PSA), and rate of excellent correction were recorded. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to evaluate the survival time of affected knees.Results: Radiation exposure, operative time and cost, required labor, rate of excellent correction, and postoperative complications were better in the navigation group than in the traditional group (P < 0.05). Six months postoperatively, the VAS and WOMAC scores were significantly improved in both groups (P < 0.001). At 24 months, the FTA, MPTA and PSA were corrected in both groups (P < 0.001), and no between-group differences were found (P > 0.05). There was no difference in the postoperative knee survival time between the traditional and laser navigation groups (P = 0.533).Conclusions: Simple laser navigation technology can effectively increase the rate of excellent leg alignment correction and reduce radiation exposure, operative time and cost, required labor, and postoperative complications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.105
GPT teacher head0.465
Teacher spread0.359 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResearch Square→Same topicTotal Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes→French-language works237,207→