MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Bayesian Additive Regression Trees, Computational Approaches

2022· other· en· W4213109796 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueWiley StatsRef: Statistics Reference Online · 2022
Typeother
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicStatistical Methods and Inference
Canadian institutionsAcadia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceMarkov chain Monte CarloVariable-order Bayesian networkBayesian probabilityTree (set theory)Machine learningBayesian inferenceTheoretical computer scienceArtificial intelligenceMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Methods based on binary trees play a fundamental role in modern data science. In this article, we give a very focused review of basic Bayesian approaches to tree modeling. Bayesian approaches have some fundamental advantages. Complex models are enhanced with meaningful prior specifications, and Markov chain Monte Carlo provides a framework for useful stochastic search of the model space along with some sense of uncertainty. Bayesian approaches require a specification of a prior in tree space and computation of a high and variable dimension posterior. We provide some computational details that are not readily available in the literature. We also review a few more recent extensions of the basic approaches to illustrate the power and potential of the overall approach.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.212
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0660.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.161
GPT teacher head0.382
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it