MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4213111905 · doi:10.1016/j.mtbio.2022.100221

Trends in hydrogel-based encapsulation technologies for advanced cell therapies applied to limb ischemia

2022· review· en· W4213111905 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueMaterials Today Bio · 2022
Typereview
Languageen
FieldEngineering
Topic3D Printing in Biomedical Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of VictoriaUniversity of British Columbia
FundersConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e TecnológicoFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo
KeywordsCell encapsulationSelf-healing hydrogelsEncapsulation (networking)Critical limb ischemiaExtracellular matrixBiomedical engineeringTissue engineeringDrug deliveryNanotechnologyMedicineMaterials scienceSurgeryCell biologyBiologyVascular diseaseArterial diseaseComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ischemia occurs when blood flow is reduced or restricted, leading to a lack of oxygen and nutrient supply and removal of metabolites in a body part. Critical limb ischemia (CLI) is a severe clinical manifestation of peripheral arterial disease. Atherosclerosis serves as the main cause of CLI, which arises from the deposition of lipids in the artery wall, forming atheroma and causing inflammation. Although several therapies exist for the treatment of CLI, pharmacotherapy still has low efficacy, and vascular surgery often cannot be performed due to the pathophysiological heterogeneity of each patient. Gene and cell therapies have emerged as alternative treatments for the treatment of CLI by promoting angiogenesis. However, the delivery of autologous, heterologous or genetically modified cells into the ischemic tissue remains challenging, as these cells can die at the injection site and/or leak into other tissues. The encapsulation of these cells within hydrogels for local delivery is probably one of the promising options today. Hydrogels, three-dimensional (3D) cross-linked polymer networks, enable manipulation of physical and chemical properties to mimic the extracellular matrix. Thus, specific biostructures can be developed by adjusting prepolymer properties and encapsulation process variables, such as viscosity and flow rate of fluids, depending on the final biomedical application. Electrostatic droplet extrusion, micromolding, microfluidics, and 3D printing have been the most commonly used technologies for cell encapsulation due to their versatility in producing different hydrogel-based systems (e.g., microgels, fibers, vascularized architectures and perfusable single vessels) with great potential to treat ischemic diseases. This review discusses the cell encapsulation technologies associated with hydrogels which are currently used for advanced therapies applied to limb ischemia, describing their principles, advantages, disadvantages, potentials, and innovative therapeutic ideas.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.945
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.318
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it