Commentary: Conquering the great barrier: Coral reef aorta

Central MessageEndovascular management of proximal symptomatic aortic coral reef lesion may be possible in patients at prohibitive open surgical risk.See Article page 17. Endovascular management of proximal symptomatic aortic coral reef lesion may be possible in patients at prohibitive open surgical risk. See Article page 17. In this edition of JTCVS Techniques, Le Bars and colleagues1Le Bars F. Charbonneau E. Leurent G. Kaladji A. First report of endovascular treatment of symptomatic coral reef aorta in the aortic arch.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Tech. 2022; 12: 17-20Google Scholar report an endovascular management of a symptomatic coral reef aorta (CRA) case affecting the aortic arch, a first in the English literature. The term “coral reef aorta” describes an atypical extensive exophytic atherosclerotic lesion that protrudes into the lumen of the affected vessel, rather than typical atherosclerotic plaques, which follow the curvature of the vessel wall.2Kopani K. Liao S. Shaffer K. The coral reef aorta: diagnosis and treatment following CT.Radiol Case Rep. 2009; 4: 209Google Scholar Unlike typical atherosclerotic processes, which primarily affect the distal aortoiliac and infrainguinal vessels, CRA is most often found in women in the paravisceral aorta, with an incidence of 0.6% to 1.8%. Although the pathophysiology of CRA is not well understood, the main theories include the thrombotic rupture of a previous aortic plaque with subsequent calcification of the thrombus, calcified previous dissections, as well as defects in regulatory molecules leading to extreme ectopic calcification.3Schlieper G. Grotemeyer D. Aretz A. Schurgers L. Krüger T. Rehbein H. et al.Analysis of calcifications in patients with coral reef aorta.Ann Vasc Surg. 2010; 24: 408-414Google Scholar CRA is typically asymptomatic. When present, symptoms are related to end-organ malperfusion due to obstruction or distal embolization. Proximal CRA in the thoracic aorta, as in the present case, is rare and can present as an acute aortic syndrome or aortic coarctation, which can mimic supravalvular aortic stenosis. Literature on the management of proximal CRA is extremely sparse and is classically treated with open surgical techniques such as aortic thromboendarterectomy or extra-anatomic bypass. Unique technical challenges regarding the endovascular management of aortic arch CRA include safely navigating devices across the lesion, with an increased risk of stroke, distal embolization, and aortic rupture/dissection during stent deployment. The choice of device is crucial. In their report, Le Bars and colleagues used a balloon-expandable covered stent graft. Advantages of this platform include the ability to postdilate the stent after initial placement, superior radial force, and precise deployment, all of which are important device characteristics for treating aortic arch occlusive pathology. Although there are reports of using uncovered stents in the visceral aorta to preserve collateral flow, this is not as important a consideration in the thoracic aorta and arch, especially given that rupture in the more proximal aorta is much more catastrophic. In the present case, the decision to revascularize the left subclavian artery concomitantly in a sandwich graft fashion may be debated. While it is always prudent to maintain patency of as many aortic branches as possible, performing an extra-anatomic bypass to the left subclavian or simply “overstenting” the left subclavian artery may have allowed a single larger stent diameter in the aorta without a competing sandwich graft, hence possibly restoring more aortic luminal diameter. Furthermore, the risk of gutter leaks with the use of a sandwich technique may yield a greater risk of complication in the event of aortic rupture during stent deployment. Long-term data are obviously lacking on the endovascular management of CRA in the aortic arch. Late complications such as stent compression/collapse, migration, and re-stenosis must be kept in mind. While the CRA may “anchor” the stent graft and minimize risk of migration, graft erosion may supervene, possibly leading to re-stenosis. We congratulate Le Bars and colleagues on continuing to advance the field of endovascular interventions on the proximal thoracic aorta and aortic arch. Their report opens a therapeutic door for a patient population often deemed at prohibitive risk for conventional open surgery. First report of endovascular treatment of symptomatic coral reef aorta in the aortic archJTCVS TechniquesVol. 12PreviewA 64-year-old female patient was treated in the Cardiology Intensive Care Unit due to decompensated heart failure with a left ventricular ejection fraction of 10%. She did not present with any serious history, other than a body mass index of 15.4 with 10 kg of weight loss in 6 months. A cardiac magnetic resonance imaging scan was performed and identified low signal intensity at the aortic arch, which led to aortic computed tomography angiography being performed. This found a 95% preocclusive limestone bud in zones 2 and 3 of the aortic arch protruding into the ostium of the left subclavian artery (Figures 1 and 2). Full-Text PDF Open Access

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.