MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4213137695 · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwab049.011

A12 STEPWISE COORDINATION OF COLONIC NEUTROPHILS AND INNATE LYMPHOID CELLS IN THE ONSET AND RESOLUTION OF CLOSTRIDIOIDES DIFFICILE TOXIN-INDUCED INJURY

2022· article· en· W4213137695 on OpenAlexaffabout
Kyle L. Flannigan, A Serra, Simon A. Hirota

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicClostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsClostridium difficile toxin AImmune systemImmunologyChemokineInnate immune systemCXCL1BiologyNeutrophil elastaseInflammationAntibodyMicrobiologyClostridium difficile

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background While our understanding and use of treatments for Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) has improved, initial CDI still carries significant morbidity and mortality owing to heterogeneity in host immune responses. Further, host immunity is a critical modulator of fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) success in CDI. Thus, understanding the host immune response during CDI is essential. Aims To assess the cellular immune responses that trigger the onset and resolution of injury and inflammation in CDI. Methods Colonic injury and inflammation triggered by CDI was modelled in mice using intrarectal installation of C. difficile toxins A and B (TcdA/B). Colonic tissue was collected at various timepoints following TcdA/B exposure to assess gene expression (qPCR), cytokine production (ELISA) and immune cell responses (flow cytometry). Knockout mice and neutralizing antibodies were used to deplete cytokines or cells. Results Examinion of colonic gene expression at different times following TcdA/B exposure found a dominant transcriptional signature related to neutrophil adhesion and diapedesis. In addition to the typical neutrophil chemokines Cxcl1 and Cxcl2, TcdA/B exposure also increased expression of neutrophil effector genes including Elane (neutrophil elastase). Neutrophil influx in response to TcdA/B was a critical driver of intestinal injury as antibody-mediated depletion of neutrophils lead to significantly less damage in the colon following TcdA/B exposure. Along with neutrophil influx, there were high levels of antimicrobial gene expression in the colon after TcdA/B exposure including RegIIIγ, S100a8, and Socs3, all genes regulated by IL-22. Upon further investigation, IL-22 was a significant mediator in the host response to TcdA/B exposure as it was upregulated >150-fold in the colon and originated from type 3 innate lymphoid cells (ILC3). Further, TcdA/B exposure in IL-22-/- mice lead to significantly more colonic damage compared to wildtype (WT) mice. Subsequent screening of previously published RNAseq data from IL-22-treated mouse colonic organoids identified various upregulated proteins involved in immune regulation, including the gene Slpi that encodes a protein (secretory leukocyte peptidase inhibitor) that inhibits leukocyte proteases, including neutrophil elastase. While TcdA/B challenge robustly induced the expression of Slpi in the colon of WT mice, IL-22-/- mice failed to express increased levels of Slpi and had greater levels of neutrophil elastase activity in the colon. Conclusions Together these data suggest a stepwise immune response to TcdA/B where ILC3 produce IL-22 to induce epithelial release of SLPI that attenuates the damaging effects of early neutrophil responses. Strategies to upregulate IL-22 may help control damage triggered by CDI and promote resolution of injury. Funding Agencies Lloyd Sutherland Chair in GI Research, Canadian Research Chair

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology→Same topicClostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research→French-language works237,207→