MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4213151916 · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwab049.231

A232 TUFT CELLS COORDINATE RAPID EXPULSION OF THE TAPEWORM <i>H. DIMINUTA</i> BUT ARE NOT REQUIRED FOR ENHANCED IMMUNITY AGAINST THE NEMATODE, <i>H. POLYGYRUS,</i> IN MICE PREVIOUSLY INFECTED WITH <i>H. DIMINUTA</i>

2022· article· en· W4213151916 on OpenAlexaff
Sruthi Rajeev, Aralia Leon‐Coria, A Wang, Constance A. M. Finney, Derek M. McKay

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicChild Nutrition and Water Access
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHeligmosomoides polygyrusHymenolepis diminutaBiologyTuftParasite hostingNematodeImmunityGallImmunologyHelminthsImmune systemCestodaEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background The tuft cell is an important sentinel that monitors the gut lumen and coordinates immunity against parasitic nematodes. We showed small intestinal tuft cell hyperplasia 11 days post-infection (dpi.) with the tapeworm Hymenolepis diminuta: a time when the parasite is no longer present in murine hosts. This may be a way by which the host protects itself from subsequent helminth-infections, a common phenomenon in parasite-endemic world regions. We test this supposition using Pou2f3-/- mice that lack tuft cells. Aims To test the hypothesis that tuft cells are important in the anti-worm response in H. diminuta ( H.d.)-infected mice subsequently infected with the nematode parasite Heligosomoides polygyrus ( H.p.). Methods Male C57BL6 and Pou2f3-/- mice (8–12 weeks) were infected with 5 H.d. cysticercoids ± 200 H.p. larvae at 10 dpi with H. diminuta (non H.p. mice - control). Upon necropsy at 24 dpi H. diminuta (i.e. 14 dpi H.p. in co-infected mice), both worms were ennumerated in small intestinal washings, H.p. granulomas examined and fecal egg counts performed. Small intestinal segments were stained for tuft (DCLK1+) and goblet cells (PAS+). As a surrogate of successful infection, IL-4 and IL-10 were measured in supernatants from concanavalin-A treated splenocytes. Results Wild-type (WT) mice expel H. diminuta by 11 dpi and this was delayed in Pou2f3-/-mice, with worms readily detectable at 14 dpi and absent by 21 dpi. Despite the delayed expulsion, both WT and Pou2f3-/- mice showed increased splenic production of IL-4 and IL-10; however, unlike WT mice, H. diminuta-infected Pou2f3-/- mice show no increase in jejunal goblet cell numbers. Mice infected with H. diminuta displayed a degree of increased resistance to H.p.-infection defined by reduced worm and egg burdens, and increased granuloma formation in comparison to H.p.-only infected animals. In this sequential co-infection model, there were no significant differences between WT and Pou2f3-/- mice in the response to H.p. Conclusions The absence of tuft cells slows expulsion of H. diminuta from its non-permissive mouse host and correlates with diminished goblet cell hyperplasia. Hypothesizing that H. diminuta-evoked tuft cell hyperplasia would enhance the immune response to a subsequent infection with an unrelated nematode parasite proved incorrect. While H. diminuta-infected mice were partially protected from H.p., response was similar in WT and Pou2f3-/- mice. Thus tuft cells are important in worm detection: yet, our co-infection data suggests that other events initiated by the primary worm infection impact the outcome of subsequent infection with a different helminth and tuft cells have a limited, if any, role to play in this helminth-host-helminth interaction. Funding Agencies CIHRNSERC, Eye’s High International doctoral scholarship

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology→Same topicChild Nutrition and Water Access→French-language works237,207→