Penser le sabotage à l’ère du capitalisme numérique
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article propose d’envisager la thèse suivante : le sabotage en tant que pratique de résistance qui consiste à endommager, perturber ou subvertir les opérations d’une machine ou d’une organisation, se retrouve à chaque forme institutionnelle du capitalisme. Trois types de sabotage sont envisagés pour penser cette pratique à l’ère du capitalisme numérique : le sabotage classique, le sabotage subtil et la résistance aux technosciences. Si le premier sabotage tend à disparaître des lieux de travail, le deuxième type consiste plutôt en la réappropriation des outils numériques pour des fins alternatives. La résistance aux technosciences correspond quant à elle au sabotage de l’idéalité cybernétique associée aux nouvelles machines algorithmiques, notamment le droit à la déconnexion et les pratiques de non-usage des technologies numériques.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it