MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4213175660 · doi:10.1101/2022.02.18.481000

ERROR MODELLED GENE EXPRESSION ANALYSIS (EMOGEA) PROVIDES A SUPERIOR OVERVIEW OF TIME COURSE RNA-SEQ MEASUREMENTS AND LOW COUNT GENE EXPRESSION

2022· preprint· en· W4213175660 on OpenAlexaff
Tobias K. Karakach, Federico Taverna, Jasmine Barra

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2022
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicSingle-cell and spatial transcriptomics
Canadian institutionsChildren's Hospital Research Institute of ManitobaDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRNA-SeqComputational biologyGene expressionRNABiologyGeneExpression (computer science)Computer scienceGeneticsTranscriptome

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Serial RNA-seq studies of bulk samples are widespread and provide an opportunity for improved understanding of gene regulation during e . g ., development or response to an incremental dose of a pharmacotherapeutic. In addition, the widely popular single cell RNA-seq (scRNA-seq) data implicitly exhibit serial characteristics because measured gene expression values recapitulate cellular transitions. Unfortunately serial RNA-seq data continue to be analyzed by methods that ignore this ordinal structure and yield results that are difficult to interpret. Here, we present Error Modelled Gene Expression Analysis (EMOGEA), a principled framework for analyzing RNA-seq data that incorporates measurement uncertainty in the analysis, while introducing a special formulation for modelling data that are acquired as a function of time or other continuous variable. By incorporating uncertainties in the analysis, EMOGEA is specifically suited for RNA-seq studies in which low-count transcripts with small fold-changes lead to significant biological effects. Such transcripts include signaling mRNAs and non-coding RNAs (ncRNA) that are known to exhibit low levels of expression. Through this approach, missing values are handled by associating with them disproportionately large uncertainties which makes it particularly useful for single cell RNA-seq data. We demonstrate the utility of this framework by extracting a cascade of gene expression waves from a well-designed RNA-seq study of zebrafish embryogenesis and, a scRNA-seq study of mouse pre-implantation and provide unique biological insights into the regulation of genes in each wave. For non-ordinal measurements, we show that EMOGEA has a much higher rate of true positive calls and a vanishingly small rate for false negative discoveries compared to common approaches. Finally, we provide an R package ( https://github.com/itikadi/EMOGEA ) that is self-contained and easy to use. Graphical Abstract: Graphical representation of EMOGEA indicating the incorporation of measurement errors in modeling RNA-seq data to generate superior results in exploratory analysis, differential gene expression analyses and, scRNA-seq and Time Course analyses.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)Same topicSingle-cell and spatial transcriptomicsFrench-language works237,207